Search for: "Hi-Ward Trading LTD"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2017, 10:04 pm
”The person that has used a trade mark (B) and wishes to rely on estoppel to ward of an infringement action by the proprietor of a registered mark (A), will have to overcome certain obstacles. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:57 am
Somehow the color scheme is also involved: “Ward has adequately explained how his trade dress is distinctive based on both the color scheme used and the general layout and spatial relationship of the various elements appearing on each page of his books. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
It's hard to imagine that a whole decade has passed since the IPKat, shortly to be followed by Merpel, first poked his nose into the blogosphere -- but that's the truth. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:59 am
X was not sufficiently confidential to amount to a trade secret. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 9:48 am
The competitor's antics may be unanticipated, even unattractive, yet lawful [Says this Kat: these words resonate with the observation of Jacob J, as he then was, in Hodgkinson & Corby Ltd v Wards Mobility Services Ltd (No.1) [1995] F.S.R. 169 that the law essentially lets a business do what it wants in a competitive environment, unless there is a specific rule to prevent it].The second factor is legal context. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:10 pm
Here's a curious tale of a trade mark that might have been. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 4:54 pm
In particular, he hopes that Hogan Lovells will spell the surname of his esteemed Kat colleague the same way that the rest of us do: it's Ward, not War ... [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:22 am
In Pinnacle Runway Pty Ltd v Triangl Ltd, the Australian Federal Court found that the name given to a style of bikini will not amount to ‘use as a trade mark’ so as to constitute trade mark use.InternKat Riana Harvey examines a recent High Court of England and Wales ruling, in which it was found that Bentley Motors had infringed a small family-run clothing firm’s ‘Bentley’ trade marks through the use of its… [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 1:41 pm
The court held that the AI-generated work is protectable by copyright law since it is as a work of legal entities.Eleonora Rosati discussed the decision of the UK Intellectual Property Enterprise Court in Response Clothing Ltd v The Edinburgh Woollen Mill Ltd case. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 2:41 am
In 2002, Mr Barry sold his then remaining shareholding in IHC Australia to Mr Jolly (and his wife) for $480,000. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
IPR Carousel Annsley Merelle Ward writes about the Fordham IP Conference. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
Continuing the food and drink theme, KatFriend Sánchez Merino provided Kat readers with his most recent summary of IP developments in South America. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 8:00 pm
Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., Global-Tech Appliances, and Pentalpha Enterprises, Ltd., 594 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:00 pm
Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., Global-Tech Appliances, and Pentalpha Enterprises, Ltd., 594 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons presents his fourth instalment [previously: here, here, here] of the Retromark trade mark litigation round up.This time around we have eight worthy UK and EU cases for you, including some big hitters in the form of Cartier, Louboutin and – because Retromark wouldn’t be complete without one – the latest round of theKit Kat saga. 1. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
DesignsRosie Burbidge published her last post as an official GuestKat, providing a tour of some recent design decisions, including Tynan v J4K Sports Ltd [2018] EWHC 3519 and Pulseon OY v Garmin (Europe) Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 138. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 12:32 pm
Publications International, Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:46 pm
Finally, if adopting these ideas means that some fiduciaries and lawyers will self-select and ply other trades, here are th [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
RUDEL, Appellee. 4th District.Guardianship -- Surcharge -- Surcharge action by guardian to recover loss of consortium award obtained by limited guardian of ward's property in medical malpractice settlement on the theory that monies recovered by limited guardian for loss of consortium belonged to ward because limited guardian's marriage to ward was void -- Error to deny petition for surcharge with prejudice where guardian may be able to state a cause of action -- Remand for… [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm
Mr Schrems has announced his intention to appeal. [read post]
